| Title |
Is the Greulich and Pyle atlas still valid for Dutch Caucasian children today?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatric Radiology, October 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s002470100531 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rick R. van Rijn, Maarten H. Lequin, Simon G. F. Robben, Wim C. J. Hop, Cornelis van Kuijk |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 16% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 21% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 55% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,517,025
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#269
of 2,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,757
of 46,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,286 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them