↓ Skip to main content

Tracing superior longitudinal fasciculus connectivity in the human brain using high resolution diffusion tensor tractography

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Structure and Function, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
253 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
305 Mendeley
Title
Tracing superior longitudinal fasciculus connectivity in the human brain using high resolution diffusion tensor tractography
Published in
Brain Structure and Function, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00429-012-0498-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arash Kamali, Adam E. Flanders, Joshua Brody, Jill V. Hunter, Khader M. Hasan

Abstract

The major language pathways such as superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) pathways have been outlined by experimental and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies. The SLF I and some of the superior parietal lobule connections of the SLF pathways have not been depicted by prior DTI studies due to the lack of imaging sensitivity and adequate spatial resolution. In the current study, the trajectory of the SLF fibers has been delineated on five healthy human subjects using diffusion tensor tractography on a 3.0-T scanner at high spatial resolution. We also demonstrate for the first time the trajectory and connectivity of the SLF fibers in relation to other language pathways as well as the superior parietal lobule connections of the language circuit using high spatial resolution DTI in the healthy adult human brain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 298 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 19%
Student > Master 50 16%
Researcher 32 10%
Student > Bachelor 30 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 8%
Other 46 15%
Unknown 64 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 68 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 55 18%
Psychology 49 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 4%
Engineering 10 3%
Other 26 9%
Unknown 85 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,827,006
of 25,072,471 outputs
Outputs from Brain Structure and Function
#575
of 1,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,543
of 293,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Structure and Function
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,072,471 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.