↓ Skip to main content

Induction of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells into tissue-forming cells in a murine model: implications for pelvic floor reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Cell and Tissue Research, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Induction of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells into tissue-forming cells in a murine model: implications for pelvic floor reconstruction
Published in
Cell and Tissue Research, February 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00441-017-2781-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Ding, Qin Han, Mou Deng, Xiao-chen Song, Chun Chen, Fang-fang Ai, Lan Zhu, Robert Chun-hua Zhao

Abstract

HUMSCs were isolated, differentiated and characterized in vitro. Both HUMSCs and smooth muscle cells differentiated from HUMSCs were used to fabricate tissue-engineered fascia equivalents. Forty-eight mature female Sprague Dawley rats were randomly assigned to four groups: group A (GynemeshTMPS, n = 12), group B (GynemeshTMPS + HUMSCs; n = 12), group C (GynemeshTMPS + smooth muscle cells differentiated from HUMSCs; n = 12) and group D (GynemeshTMPS + HUMSCs + smooth muscle cells differentiated from HUMSCs; n = 12). The posterior vaginal wall was incised from the introitus and the mesh was then implanted. Three implants of each type were tested at 1, 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Fibrotic remodeling, inflammation, vascularization and tissue regeneration were histologically assessed. The levels of type I and type III collagen were determined. There was no difference in fibrotic remodeling between cell-seeded and unseeded meshes at any time (p > 0.05). At 12 weeks, there did not appear to be fewer inflammatory cells around the filament bundles in the mesh with cells compared with the mesh alone (P > 0.05). Group D showed a trend toward better vascularization at 12 weeks compared with group A (P < 0.05). Twelve weeks after implantation, a thin layer of new tissue growth covered the unseeded scaffold and a thicker layer covered the cell-seeded scaffold (P < 0.05). No significant difference in the ratio of collagen type I/III could be detected among the different groups after 12 weeks (P > 0.05). HUMSCs with differentiated smooth muscle cells might have a potential role in fascia tissue engineering to repair POP in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Materials Science 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2019.
All research outputs
#18,563,902
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#1,645
of 2,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,758
of 331,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#25
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.