↓ Skip to main content

Molecular characterization and embryonic expression of innexins in the leech Hirudo medicinalis

Overview of attention for article published in Development Genes and Evolution, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Molecular characterization and embryonic expression of innexins in the leech Hirudo medicinalis
Published in
Development Genes and Evolution, January 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00427-005-0048-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iain M. Dykes, Eduardo R. Macagno

Abstract

Gap junctions are direct intercellular channels that permit the passage of ions and small signaling molecules. The temporal and spatial regulation of gap junctional communication is, thus, one mechanism by which cell interactions, and hence cell properties and cell fate, may be regulated during development. The nervous system of the leech, Hirudo medicinalis, is a particularly advantageous system in which to study developmental mechanisms involving gap junctions because interactions between identified cells may be studied in vivo in both the embryo and the adult. As in most invertebrates, gap junctions in the leech are composed of innexin proteins, which are distantly related to the vertebrate pannexins and are encoded by a multi-gene family. We have cloned ten novel leech innexins and describe the expression of these, plus two other previously reported members of this gene family, in the leech embryo between embryonic days 6 and 12, a period during which the main features of the central nervous system are established. Four innexins are expressed in neurons and two in glia, while several innexins are expressed in the excretory, circulatory, and reproductive organs. Of particular interest is Hm-inx6, whose expression appears to be restricted to the characterized S cell and two other neurons putatively identified as presynaptic to this cell. Two other innexins also show highly restricted expressions in neurons and may be developmentally regulated.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 26%
Researcher 6 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 22%
Neuroscience 4 15%
Computer Science 1 4%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2008.
All research outputs
#7,855,444
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Development Genes and Evolution
#150
of 495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,853
of 158,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Development Genes and Evolution
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 495 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.