↓ Skip to main content

Genetic mappings in artificial genomes

Overview of attention for article published in Theory in Biosciences, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Genetic mappings in artificial genomes
Published in
Theory in Biosciences, September 2004
DOI 10.1016/j.thbio.2004.04.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maciej Komosinski, Szymon Ulatowski

Abstract

This paper concerns processing of genomes of artificial (computer-simulated) organisms. Of special interest is the process of translation of genotypes into phenotypes, and utilizing the mapping information obtained during such translation. If there exists more than one genetic encoding in a single artificial life model, then the translation may also occur between different encodings. The obtained mapping information allows to present genes-phenes relationships visually and interactively to a person, in order to increase understanding of the genotype-tophenotype translation process and genetic encoding properties. As the mapping associates parts of the source sequence with the translated destination, it may be also used to trace genes, phenes, and their relationships during simulated evolution.A mappings composition procedure is formally described, and a simple method of visual mapping presentation is established. Finally, advanced visualizations of gene-phene relationships are demonstrated as practical examples of introduced techniques. These visualizations concern genotypes expressed in various encodings, including an encoding which exhibits polygenic and pleiotropic properties.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 8%
Netherlands 1 8%
Unknown 11 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 46%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 15%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 69%
Computer Science 2 15%
Psychology 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2023.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Theory in Biosciences
#76
of 217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,278
of 71,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory in Biosciences
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them