↓ Skip to main content

Asymmetric graphs

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Mathematica Hungarica, September 1963
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 193)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
240 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Asymmetric graphs
Published in
Acta Mathematica Hungarica, September 1963
DOI 10.1007/bf01895716
Authors

P. Erdős, A. Rényi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 55 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 26%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Master 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 16 28%
Mathematics 12 21%
Engineering 6 10%
Physics and Astronomy 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Acta Mathematica Hungarica
#13
of 193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285
of 1,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Mathematica Hungarica
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them