↓ Skip to main content

Age and growth of Neotrygon picta, Neotrygon annotata and Neotrygon kuhlii from north‐east Australia, with notes on their reproductive biology

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Fish Biology, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Age and growth of Neotrygon picta, Neotrygon annotata and Neotrygon kuhlii from north‐east Australia, with notes on their reproductive biology
Published in
Journal of Fish Biology, December 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02829.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

I. P. Jacobsen, M. B. Bennett

Abstract

Vertebral band formations were used to define age and growth in three Neotrygon species caught regularly as by-catch in prawn trawl fisheries in north-east Australia. Centrum edge and marginal increment ratio analyses were used to validate annual band formations. Age estimates ranged from 1 to 18 years, with the von Bertalanffy growth function considered to have the best fit to Neotrygon picta (males, W(D∞) = 271 mm, k = 0·12; females, W(D∞) = 360·5 mm, k = 0·08) and Neotrygon kuhlii (males, W(D∞) = 438·6 mm, k = 0·08; females, W(D∞) = 440·6 mm, k = 0·08) disc width (W(D))-at-age data. The Gompertz growth function had the best fit to Neotrygon annotata W(D)-at-age data (males, W(D∞) = 230·4 mm, k = 0·20; females, W(D∞) = 265·5 mm, k = 0·31). Age at sexual maturity ranged from 3 to 6 years, with N. picta having the smallest size at birth (100 mm W(D)), smallest W(D) at 50% maturity (W(D50): male, 172 mm, female, 180·7 mm) and lowest age at sexual maturity (3-4 years). This study helps redefine and improve the accuracy of fisheries-based risk assessments for these small species with relatively conservative life-history variables.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mozambique 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 25%
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Master 8 15%
Other 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 58%
Environmental Science 8 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 5 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2015.
All research outputs
#8,264,051
of 24,739,153 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Fish Biology
#1,634
of 5,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,969
of 191,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Fish Biology
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,739,153 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.