↓ Skip to main content

A study of race and gender bias in the punishment of handicapped school children

Overview of attention for article published in The Urban Review, December 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
A study of race and gender bias in the punishment of handicapped school children
Published in
The Urban Review, December 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf01108358
Authors

Anna C. McFadden, George E. Marsh, Barrie Jo Price, Yunhan Hwang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 17%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Master 4 7%
Professor 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 23 43%
Psychology 9 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The Urban Review
#140
of 400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,513
of 67,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Urban Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them