↓ Skip to main content

Social anxiety spectrum

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Social anxiety spectrum
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, December 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00406-003-0442-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liliana Dell’Osso, Paola Rucci, Francesca Ducci, Antonio Ciapparelli, Laura Vivarelli, Marina Carlini, Carla Ramacciotti, Giovanni B. Cassano

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to provide the prevalence rates of mild, moderate and severe symptoms of social anxiety in a sample of high school students and to analyze gender differences and associated impairment levels within these three levels of severity. Five hundred and twenty students were assessed with the Social Anxiety Spectrum Self-Report (SHY-SR), a questionnaire that explores social anxiety spectrum. By applying two cut-off scores determined on a separate sample by using ROC analysis, the large majority (73.3 %) of subjects were classified as low scorers, 9% as medium scorers and 17.7% as high scorers. Fears related to social situations were reported both by high and medium scorers. Functional impairment defined by avoidance and school difficulties was more common among high scorers, but it was also reported to a significant extent by medium scorers. Compared to low and medium scorers, high scorers showed a higher F/M ratio (about 4:1) and a more homogeneous symptomatological profile in the two genders. In conclusion, our report confirms, in line with the literature, that even moderate levels of social anxiety are associated with significant functional impairment and distress for the individuals.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Greece 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 63 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 16 24%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2010.
All research outputs
#7,855,444
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#462
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,420
of 136,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.