↓ Skip to main content

Role of active metabolites in the use of opioids

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Role of active metabolites in the use of opioids
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, October 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00228-008-0570-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet K. Coller, Lona L. Christrup, Andrew A. Somogyi

Abstract

The opioid class of drugs, a large group, is mainly used for the treatment of acute and chronic persistent pain. All are eliminated from the body via metabolism involving principally CYP3A4 and the highly polymorphic CYP2D6, which markedly affects the drug's function, and by conjugation reactions mainly by UGT2B7. In many cases, the resultant metabolites have the same pharmacological activity as the parent opioid; however in many cases, plasma metabolite concentrations are too low to make a meaningful contribution to the overall clinical effects of the parent drug. These metabolites are invariably more water soluble and require renal clearance as an important overall elimination pathway. Such metabolites have the potential to accumulate in the elderly and in those with declining renal function with resultant accumulation to a much greater extent than the parent opioid. The best known example is the accumulation of morphine-6-glucuronide from morphine. Some opioids have active metabolites but at different target sites. These are norpethidine, a neurotoxic agent, and nordextropropoxyphene, a cardiotoxic agent. Clinicians need to be aware that many opioids have active metabolites that will become therapeutically important, for example in cases of altered pathology, drug interactions and genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Thus, dose individualisation and the avoidance of adverse effects of opioids due to the accumulation of active metabolites or lack of formation of active metabolites are important considerations when opioids are used.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Chile 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 79 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 14%
Chemistry 10 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 16 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,731,859
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#327
of 2,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,018
of 91,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.