↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacokinetics, oral bioavailability, and metabolic profile of resveratrol and its dimethylether analog, pterostilbene, in rats

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
7 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
434 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacokinetics, oral bioavailability, and metabolic profile of resveratrol and its dimethylether analog, pterostilbene, in rats
Published in
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00280-010-1525-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Izet M. Kapetanovic, Miguel Muzzio, Zhihua Huang, Thomas N. Thompson, David L. McCormick

Abstract

Resveratrol (3,5,4'-trihydroxy-trans-stilbene) is a naturally occurring polyphenol with a broad range of possible health benefits, including anti-cancer activity. However, the biological activity of resveratrol may be limited by poor absorption and first-pass metabolism: only low plasma concentrations of resveratrol are seen following oral administration, and metabolism to glucuronide and sulfate conjugates is rapid. Methylated polyphenol analogs (such as pterostilbene [3,5-dimethoxy-4'-hydroxy-trans-stilbene], the dimethylether analog of resveratrol) may overcome these limitations to pharmacologic efficacy. The present study was designed to compare the bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and metabolism of resveratrol and pterostilbene following equimolar oral dosing in rats.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 251 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 18%
Student > Bachelor 35 14%
Researcher 33 13%
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 57 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 35 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 8%
Chemistry 20 8%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 72 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,873,161
of 24,051,764 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#233
of 2,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,152
of 186,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,051,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,510 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.