↓ Skip to main content

Mutations of the Prion Protein Gene

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
33 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
242 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
Title
Mutations of the Prion Protein Gene
Published in
Journal of Neurology, November 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00415-002-0896-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gábor G. Kovács, Gianriccardo Trabattoni, Johannes A. Hainfellner, James W. Ironside, Richard S. G. Knight, Herbert Budka

Abstract

Prion diseases are inherited in 5-15 % of cases. They are classified according to changes in the prion protein gene ( PRNP) or conventionally according to phenotype as Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker disease (GSS), fatal familial insomnia (FFI), or familial Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (fCJD). Point mutations and insertions within PRNP form the genetic background. We report the results of a systematic analysis of over 500 case reports of patients with PRNP abnormalities. We compare clinical, neuropathological and molecular data in five groups, namely GSS, FFI, fCJD, base pair insertion (BPI), and all cases collectively. Clinical presentation overlaps between mutations, but some have characteristic features (e. g. P105L, D178N-129M, T183A). Some mutations, especially in the lack of sufficient family history, in earlier phases tend to resemble other neurodegenerative disorders like multiple system atrophy, corticobasal degeneration or familial diseases such as late-onset spinocerebellar ataxia, spastic paraparesis, frontotemporal dementia, or Alzheimer's disease. The codon 129 polymorphism has a phenotypic influence in inherited prion diseases, as in non-genetic forms, but additional factors might be considered as background for phenotypic variability.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Japan 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 113 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 17%
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Master 11 9%
Other 8 7%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 14%
Neuroscience 12 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 24 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2017.
All research outputs
#3,272,132
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#819
of 4,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,574
of 49,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.