↓ Skip to main content

Surgical Treatment of Winged Scapula

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Surgical Treatment of Winged Scapula
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11999-007-0086-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory J. Galano, Louis U. Bigliani, Christopher S. Ahmad, William N. Levine

Abstract

Injuries to the long thoracic and spinal accessory nerves present challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Palsies of the serratus anterior and trapezius muscles lead to destabilization of the scapula with medial and lateral scapular winging, respectively. Although nonoperative treatment is successful in some patients, failures have led to the evolution of surgical techniques involving various combinations of fascial graft and/or transfer of adjacent muscles. Our preferred method of reconstruction for serratus anterior palsy is a two-incision, split pectoralis major transfer without fascial graft. For trapezius palsy, we prefer a modified version of the Eden-Lange procedure. At a minimum followup of 16 months (mean, 47 months), six patients who underwent the Eden-Lange procedure showed improvement in mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder scores (33.3-64.6), forward elevation (141.7-151.0), and visual analog scale (7.0-2.3). At a minimum followup of 16 months (mean, 44 months), 10 patients (11 shoulders) who underwent split pectoralis transfer also improved American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder scores (53.3-63.8), forward elevation (158.2-164.5), and visual analog scale (5.0-2.9). We encountered two complications, both superficial wound infections. These tendon transfers were effective for treating scapular winging in patients who did not respond to nonoperative treatment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ukraine 1 <1%
Unknown 100 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 19 19%
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 28 28%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 61%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 20 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#2,440
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,637
of 168,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#22
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.