↓ Skip to main content

Detection errors onthe andand: Evidence for reading units larger than the word

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, November 1977
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Detection errors onthe andand: Evidence for reading units larger than the word
Published in
Memory & Cognition, November 1977
DOI 10.3758/bf03197410
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam Drewnowski, Alice F. Healy

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 59 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Master 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 22 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 39%
Linguistics 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 25 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#491
of 1,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,297
of 5,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them