↓ Skip to main content

In vitro ectomycorrhizal formation in Picea glehnii seedlings

Overview of attention for article published in Mycorrhiza, December 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
In vitro ectomycorrhizal formation in Picea glehnii seedlings
Published in
Mycorrhiza, December 1996
DOI 10.1007/s005720050146
Authors

M. C. M. Kasuya, Tsuneo Igarashi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 26%
Researcher 4 21%
Student > Master 3 16%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2014.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Mycorrhiza
#187
of 692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,848
of 92,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mycorrhiza
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 692 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them