↓ Skip to main content

Rotators, periodicity, and absence of diffusion in cyclic cellular automata

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Statistical Physics, January 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Rotators, periodicity, and absence of diffusion in cyclic cellular automata
Published in
Journal of Statistical Physics, January 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf02186804
Authors

L. A. Bunimovich, S. E. Troubetzkoy

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Professor 1 5%
Researcher 1 5%
Unknown 15 79%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 15 79%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2007.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Statistical Physics
#202
of 1,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,401
of 71,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Statistical Physics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,730 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them