↓ Skip to main content

Case report: lipid inclusion in glomerular endothelial and mesangial cells in a patient after contrast medium injection

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nephrology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Case report: lipid inclusion in glomerular endothelial and mesangial cells in a patient after contrast medium injection
Published in
BMC Nephrology, March 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12882-018-0844-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hua Su, Chen Ye, Qian Wen, Hong-Yan Zhu, Li-Xia Yi, Chun Zhang

Abstract

It is well-recognized that injection of iodinated radiographic contrast media (CM) sometimes causes acute renal injury via multiple mechanisms, such as vasoconstriction, toxicity on glomerular endothelium and tubular epithelium and so forth. A 51-year-old man developed acute renal injury with proteinuria after CM administration. To our surprise, in his renal biopsy sample the myelin figure like structure was observed in glomerular endothelium and mesangial cells by transmission electron microscopy. However the patient didn't has any clinic clues of Fabry disease and other lysosomal storage disorders. Moreover in vitro cultured glomerular endothelial and mesangial cells we found CM triggers lipid aggregation along with the increased CD36 and decreased ABCA1 abundance. Thus this patient was administrated statin to correct the aberrant lipid trafficking, 2 months later at his next visit we found his renal function partially recovered with reduced proteinuria. Besides the well-known underlying mechanisms, CM may cause renal impairment by triggering the dysregulated transportation of lipid. Furthermore statin is suggested to be a very promising medicine to decrease side effects of CM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 20%
Other 2 20%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Psychology 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2018.
All research outputs
#18,590,133
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nephrology
#1,895
of 2,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,064
of 331,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nephrology
#27
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,498 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.