↓ Skip to main content

Defining and classifying syncope

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Autonomic Research, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Defining and classifying syncope
Published in
Clinical Autonomic Research, October 2004
DOI 10.1007/s10286-004-1002-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roland D. Thijs, Wouter Wieling, Horacio Kaufmann, Gert van Dijk

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 41 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Master 5 11%
Professor 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Engineering 2 4%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 14 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,689,410
of 23,393,453 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Autonomic Research
#306
of 791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,102
of 61,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Autonomic Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,393,453 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them