↓ Skip to main content

Facilitation of neonatal endotracheal intubation with mivacurium and fentanyl in the neonatal intensive care unit

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Facilitation of neonatal endotracheal intubation with mivacurium and fentanyl in the neonatal intensive care unit
Published in
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, April 2006
DOI 10.1136/adc.2005.087213
Pubmed ID
Authors

E M Dempsey, F Al Hazzani, D Faucher, K J Barrington

Abstract

Endotracheal intubation in the neonate is painful and is associated with adverse physiological effects. Some premedication regimens have been shown to reduce these effects, but the optimal regimen is not yet determined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 49 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 16%
Researcher 7 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 14%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#966
of 2,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,868
of 83,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.