↓ Skip to main content

Clinical evaluation of methoxvflurane in obstetrical anaesthesia: A report on 500 cases

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, July 1962
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions
Title
Clinical evaluation of methoxvflurane in obstetrical anaesthesia: A report on 500 cases
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, July 1962
DOI 10.1007/bf03021269
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michel Boisvert, Fernando Hudon

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1,392
of 2,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276
of 1,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them