| Title |
Evaluation of two group therapies to reduce fear of progression in cancer patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-009-0696-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Herschbach, Katrin Book, Andreas Dinkel, Petra Berg, Sabine Waadt, Gabriele Duran, Ursula Engst-Hastreiter, Gerhard Henrich |
| Abstract |
This paper aims to evaluate the effects of two psychotherapeutic interventions on dysfunctional fear of progression (FoP) in cancer patients and to investigate illness-specific influences. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 127 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 23% |
| Unknown | 16 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 55 | 42% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,861,137
of 25,173,778 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,928
of 5,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,537
of 103,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,173,778 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.