↓ Skip to main content

Kinetics of hydrogen absorption in alpha titanium

Overview of attention for article published in Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, June 1988
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Kinetics of hydrogen absorption in alpha titanium
Published in
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, June 1988
DOI 10.1007/bf02674016
Authors

Charles C. Brown, Robert E. Buxbaum

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 36%
Researcher 4 36%
Other 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 3 27%
Engineering 3 27%
Chemistry 2 18%
Physics and Astronomy 2 18%
Unknown 1 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A
#223
of 1,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,750
of 12,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.