| Title |
The full spectrum of human naive T cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Immunology, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41577-018-0001-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Theo van den Broek, José A. M. Borghans, Femke van Wijk |
| Abstract |
Naive T cells have long been regarded as a developmentally synchronized and fairly homogeneous and quiescent cell population, the size of which depends on age, thymic output and prior infections. However, there is increasing evidence that naive T cells are heterogeneous in phenotype, function, dynamics and differentiation status. Current strategies to identify naive T cells should be adjusted to take this heterogeneity into account. Here, we provide an integrated, revised view of the naive T cell compartment and discuss its implications for healthy ageing, neonatal immunity and T cell reconstitution following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 4% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 3% |
| Sweden | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Singapore | 2 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 33 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 57% |
| Scientists | 36 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 691 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 691 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 125 | 18% |
| Researcher | 111 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 81 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 62 | 9% |
| Other | 41 | 6% |
| Other | 92 | 13% |
| Unknown | 179 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 157 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 128 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 76 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 47 | 7% |
| Unknown | 200 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#484,223
of 25,128,618 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Immunology
#235
of 2,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,186
of 338,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Immunology
#6
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,128,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.