Title |
Wild Mushroom Markets in Central Mexico and a Case Study at Ozumba
|
---|---|
Published in |
Economic Botany, October 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12231-008-9043-6 |
Authors |
Jesús Pérez-Moreno, Magdalena Martínez-Reyes, Angélica Yescas-Pérez, Adriana Delgado-Alvarado, Beatriz Xoconostle-Cázares |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Mexico | 2 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Algeria | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 77 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
Other | 17 | 20% |
Unknown | 16 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 44% |
Environmental Science | 9 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Unknown | 16 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,012,833
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#19
of 844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,243
of 91,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.