↓ Skip to main content

Effects of the novel NMDA-receptor antagonist SDZ EAA 494 on memory and attention in humans

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, April 1996
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Effects of the novel NMDA-receptor antagonist SDZ EAA 494 on memory and attention in humans
Published in
Psychopharmacology, April 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02246666
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Rockstroh, M. Emre, R. Pokorny, A. Tarral

Abstract

Effects of the novel competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor antagonist SDZ EAA 494 were investigated on memory and attention in humans. SDZ EAA 494 was administered either as single doses at a dose range of 1-50 mg, or as multiple doses over the course of 1 week at doses of 25 mg once or twice daily. Selected cognitive functions were assessed at baseline, 2 and 4 h after single dose administration, and at baseline, 2, 4 and 8 h on days 1 and 7 of multiple dose administration. The assessments included simple and complex reaction time tests to assess attention, and verbal, non-verbal and spatial memory tests with immediate and late recall. Verbal and non-verbal memory test performance was significantly impaired at a dose level of 50 mg after single administration, and of 25 mg twice daily after multiple administration, without concomitant significant impairment of reaction time. Spatial memory test performance was not significantly affected. The maximum effect occurred 2 h postmedication and was more pronounced after repeated administration. These results suggest that the inhibition of NMDA-receptors in humans may impair memory processes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Professor 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2023.
All research outputs
#5,429,316
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#1,357
of 5,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,722
of 27,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.