↓ Skip to main content

Glatiramer Acetate

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
Title
Glatiramer Acetate
Published in
Drugs, September 2012
DOI 10.2165/11204560-000000000-00000
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalie J. Carter, Gillian M. Keating

Abstract

Glatiramer acetate is a synthetic analogue of the multiple sclerosis (MS)-associated antigen, myelin basic protein. It is indicated in the EU, US and many other countries to reduce the frequency of relapses in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), and for the treatment of patients who have experienced a well defined first clinical episode and are at high risk of developing clinically definite MS or have features of MS on MRI. The efficacy of glatiramer acetate in patients with RRMS has been shown in two randomized, double-blind, multicentre phase III trials. In one trial, glatiramer acetate was associated with a significantly lower mean relapse rate than placebo after 24 months' treatment (primary endpoint). In an ongoing open-label extension to this trial, glatiramer acetate was associated with a sustained reduction in the relapse rate at the 6-, 8- and 15-year follow-ups. In the other trial, the mean cumulative number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions on T1-weighted MRI images was significantly lower in glatiramer acetate versus placebo recipients after 9 months' treatment (primary endpoint). Glatiramer acetate also had generally similar efficacy to subcutaneous interferon (IFN)-beta-1a or IFNbeta-1b in two large randomized, open-label, multicentre phase III trials conducted over 96 weeks or >or=2 years. These data were supported by those from a smaller randomized, open-label phase IV trial that utilized a unique imaging protocol to evaluate the efficacy of glatiramer acetate versus that of IFNbeta-1b over >or=2 years. In these trials, there was no significant difference between glatiramer acetate and IFNbeta recipients in any of the clinical endpoints at study end (e.g. time to first relapse [primary endpoint of the REGARD trial] or risk of relapse [primary endpoint of the BEYOND trial]). Moreover, there was no significant difference between glatiramer acetate and IFNbeta-1b recipients in the median number of combined active lesions per patient per monthly MRI scan during the first 12 months of treatment (primary endpoint of the BECOME trial). In general, there was no significant between-group difference in the majority of other MRI-assessed endpoints in any of the trials. The efficacy of glatiramer acetate in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) was established in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre phase III trial (the PreCISe trial). In this study, glatiramer acetate was associated with a significantly longer time to conversion to clinically definite MS than placebo (primary endpoint). Glatiramer acetate was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, with most adverse events being mild to moderate in severity. Injection site-related reactions and immediate post-injection systemic reactions were the most frequently observed adverse events associated with glatiramer acetate in clinical studies. In conclusion, glatiramer acetate is a valuable first-line option in the treatment of RRMS, as well as being an option in the treatment of CIS.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 102 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 23 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Drugs
#1,511
of 3,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,635
of 188,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs
#577
of 1,509 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,509 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.