| Title |
Evaluation of magnetic cellulose bead-based DNA extraction from faecal materials for high-throughput bacterial community analyses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Entomology and Zoology, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13355-018-0551-2 |
| Authors |
Tanzila Afrin, Asuka Kounosu, Mohammad-Masum Billah, Kazunori Murase, Taisei Kikuchi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 56% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,810,205
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Applied Entomology and Zoology
#52
of 340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,373
of 330,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Entomology and Zoology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 340 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them