You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genotyping of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms by High-Resolution Melting of Small Amplicons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Chemistry, July 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1373/clinchem.2004.032136 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Liew, Robert Pryor, Robert Palais, Cindy Meadows, Maria Erali, Elaine Lyon, Carl Wittwer |
| Abstract |
High-resolution melting of PCR amplicons with the DNA dye LCGreen I was recently introduced as a homogeneous, closed-tube method of genotyping that does not require probes or real-time PCR. We adapted this system to genotype single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) after rapid-cycle PCR (12 min) of small amplicons (</=50 bp). |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 415 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Belgium | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 2% |
| Unknown | 380 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 86 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 77 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 78 | 19% |
| Unknown | 59 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 205 | 49% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 62 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 8% |
| Engineering | 11 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 30 | 7% |
| Unknown | 70 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,029,825
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Chemistry
#273
of 7,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,604
of 61,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Chemistry
#2
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.