You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Tobacco, alcohol use and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: The Liver Cancer Pooling Project
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of Cancer, March 2018
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41416-018-0007-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jessica L. Petrick, Peter T. Campbell, Jill Koshiol, Jake E. Thistle, Gabriella Andreotti, Laura E. Beane-Freeman, Julie E. Buring, Andrew T. Chan, Dawn Q. Chong, Michele M. Doody, Susan M. Gapstur, John Michael Gaziano, Edward Giovannucci, Barry I. Graubard, I-Min Lee, Linda M. Liao, Martha S. Linet, Julie R. Palmer, Jenny N. Poynter, Mark P. Purdue, Kim Robien, Lynn Rosenberg, Catherine Schairer, Howard D. Sesso, Rashmi Sinha, Meir J. Stampfer, Marcia Stefanick, Jean Wactawski-Wende, Xuehong Zhang, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Neal D. Freedman, Katherine A. McGlynn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 40% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 163 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
Researcher | 14 | 9% |
Student > Master | 14 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
Other | 30 | 18% |
Unknown | 59 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 5% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 8% |
Unknown | 72 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,657,063
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#697
of 11,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,548
of 351,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#11
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,040 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.