↓ Skip to main content

The cladistic solution to the species problem

Overview of attention for article published in Biology & Philosophy, January 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
The cladistic solution to the species problem
Published in
Biology & Philosophy, January 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf00144036
Authors

Mark Ridley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 76 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 25%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 50%
Philosophy 7 9%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 13 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,416,242
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#321
of 660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,256
of 53,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them