↓ Skip to main content

Resistance Trends and Treatment Options in Gram-Negative Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Overview of attention for article published in Current Infectious Disease Reports, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Resistance Trends and Treatment Options in Gram-Negative Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Published in
Current Infectious Disease Reports, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11908-018-0609-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathaniel J. Rhodes, Caroline E. Cruce, J. Nicholas O’Donnell, Richard G. Wunderink, Alan R. Hauser

Abstract

Hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) are frequent causes of infection among critically ill patients. VAP is the most common hospital-acquired bacterial infection among mechanically ventilated patients. Unfortunately, many of the nosocomial Gram-negative bacteria that cause VAP are increasingly difficult to treat. Additionally, the evolution and dissemination of multi- and pan-drug resistant strains leave clinicians with few treatment options. VAP patients represent a dynamic population at risk for antibiotic failure and under-dosing due to altered antibiotic pharmacokinetic parameters. Since few antibiotic agents have been approved within the last 15 years, and no new agents specifically targeting VAP have been approved to date, it is anticipated that this problem will worsen. Given the public health crisis posed by resistant Gram-negative bacteria, it is essential to establish a firm understanding of the current epidemiology of VAP, the changing trends in Gram-negative resistance in VAP, and the current issues in drug development for Gram-negative bacteria that cause VAP. Rapid identification technologies and phenotypic methods, new therapeutic strategies, and novel treatment paradigms have evolved in an attempt to improve treatment outcomes for VAP; however, clinical data supporting alternative treatment strategies and adjunctive therapies remain sparse. Importantly, new classes of antimicrobials, novel virulence factor inhibitors, and beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations are currently in development. Conscientious stewardship of new and emerging therapeutic agents will be needed to ensure they remain effective well into the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 31 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 6%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 36 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2018.
All research outputs
#14,969,772
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Current Infectious Disease Reports
#343
of 489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,041
of 331,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Infectious Disease Reports
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 489 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.