↓ Skip to main content

Novel mutations in the CDKL5 gene, predicted effects and associated phenotypes

Overview of attention for article published in neurogenetics, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Novel mutations in the CDKL5 gene, predicted effects and associated phenotypes
Published in
neurogenetics, February 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10048-009-0177-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Russo, M. Marchi, F. Cogliati, M. T. Bonati, M. Pintaudi, E. Veneselli, V. Saletti, M. Balestrini, B. Ben-Zeev, L. Larizza

Abstract

It has been found that CDKL5 gene mutations are responsible for early-onset epilepsy and drug resistance. We screened a population of 92 patients with classic/atypical Rett syndrome, 17 Angelman/Angelman-like patients and six idiopathic autistic patients for CDKL5 mutations and exon deletions and identified seven novel mutations: six in the Rett subset and one in an Angelman patient. This last, an insertion in exon 11, c.903_904 dupGA, p.Leu302Aspfx49X, is associated with a relatively mild clinical presentation as the patient is the only one capable of sitting and walking alone. Of the six mutations, two are de novo missense changes affecting highly conserved aminoacid residues, c.215 T > C p.Ile72Thr and c.380A > G p.His127Arg (present in a mosaic condition) found in two girls with the most severe clinical presentation, while the remaining are the splicing c.145 + 2 T > C and c.2376 + 5G > A, the c.1648C > T p.Arg550X and the MPLA-identified c.162_99del261 mutation. RNA characterisation of four mutations revealed the aberrant transcript of the missense allele (case 2) and not the stop mutation (case 3), but also allowed the splicing mutation (case 1) and the c.-162_99del261 (case 4) to be categorised as truncating. The obtained data reinforce the view that a more severe phenotype is due more to an altered protein than haploinsufficiency. Furthermore, the mutational repertoire of the CDKL5 gene is shown to be expanded by testing patients with phenotypical overlap to Rett syndrome and applying multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 20%
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 12%
Neuroscience 9 10%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 14 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2010.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from neurogenetics
#116
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,001
of 93,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from neurogenetics
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.