Title |
Autoradiography techniques and quantification of drug distribution
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cell and Tissue Research, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00441-014-2093-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eric G. Solon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 95 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 22 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 21 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 18% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 15% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 14% |
Chemistry | 9 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
Other | 17 | 18% |
Unknown | 22 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,400,274
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Cell and Tissue Research
#45
of 2,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,930
of 356,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell and Tissue Research
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.