↓ Skip to main content

Kinetics of creatine ingested as a food ingredient

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Kinetics of creatine ingested as a food ingredient
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00421-007-0558-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise Deldicque, Jacques Décombaz, Hermann Zbinden Foncea, Jacques Vuichoud, Jacques R. Poortmans, Marc Francaux

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to test if the consumption of creatine incorporated in food bars modifies creatine plasma kinetics, erythrocyte retention and loss in urine and in feces when compared with its consumption in the form of an aqueous solution (AS). Seventeen healthy young men ingested 2 g creatine either in the form of AS, or incorporated in a protein (PP)- or in a beta-glucan (BG)-rich food bar. Kinetics of plasma creatine was measured for 8-h duration and urinary excretion for 24 h. Then, the subjects received the same treatment thrice a day for 1 week at the end of which creatine contents were determined in erythrocytes and in feces (n = 4 for feces). The three crossover treatments were interspaced by a 40 +/- 1.2-day wash-out. Absorption of creatine was slowed down by 8-fold in the presence of BG (P < 0.001) and by 4-fold with PP (P < 0.001) whereas the velocity rate constant of elimination and the area under the curve were not modified. Urinary loss of creatine in the first 24 h following ingestion was 15 +/- 1.9% in AS and 14 +/- 2.2% in PP conditions (NS), whereas it was only 8 +/- 1.2% with BG (P = 0.004). Increase in creatine concentration in erythrocyte was similar in whatever form the creatine was ingested. Creatine seems to be totally absorbed since no creatine or creatinine was detectable in feces. No side effects were reported. In conclusion, ingestion of creatine combined with BG facilitates its retention by slowing down its absorption rate and reducing its urinary excretion.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Slovenia 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 78 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 20%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 25 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 17 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 27 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,738,651
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,734
of 4,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,475
of 84,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#14
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.