↓ Skip to main content

The Influence of Cervicovaginal Microbiota on Mucosal Immunity and Prophylaxis in the Battle against HIV

Overview of attention for article published in Current HIV/AIDS Reports, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
The Influence of Cervicovaginal Microbiota on Mucosal Immunity and Prophylaxis in the Battle against HIV
Published in
Current HIV/AIDS Reports, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11904-018-0380-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mara Farcasanu, Douglas S. Kwon

Abstract

Young women in sub-Saharan Africa bear a disproportionate burden of the global HIV epidemic. In this review, we examine how cervicovaginal microbiota modulate structural and immune defenses in the female genital tract and influence HIV susceptibility. Highly diverse, anaerobic cervicovaginal microbiota prevalent in sub-Saharan African women increase HIV acquisition risk by over fourfold. These bacteria weaken the barrier properties of the vaginal mucosa and increase local inflammation and HIV target cell recruitment, creating an environment permissive to HIV. These communities also diminish the prophylactic efficacy of topical tenofovir and therefore may modulate both biological susceptibility to HIV and the effectiveness of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Cervicovaginal bacteria influence multiple reproductive health outcomes, including HIV acquisition. High-diversity, low Lactobacillus abundance cervicovaginal communities prevalent in many regions with high HIV incidence are associated with increased HIV susceptibility. A better understanding of the host-microbial interactions mediating this risk is important to reduce HIV infections, particularly among women living in sub-Saharan Africa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 29%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 17 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,206,173
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#63
of 434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,169
of 332,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current HIV/AIDS Reports
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.