↓ Skip to main content

Cobalt—Its recovery, recycling, and application

Overview of attention for article published in JOM, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
16 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Cobalt—Its recovery, recycling, and application
Published in
JOM, October 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11837-006-0201-y
Authors

Shijie Wang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 89 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Researcher 9 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 18 20%
Materials Science 15 16%
Chemistry 11 12%
Environmental Science 9 10%
Chemical Engineering 7 8%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 25 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from JOM
#334
of 1,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,390
of 69,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOM
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.