↓ Skip to main content

Pythium arrhenomanes causal agent of root rot on yellow maize in Mexico

Overview of attention for article published in Australasian Plant Disease Notes, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 141)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Pythium arrhenomanes causal agent of root rot on yellow maize in Mexico
Published in
Australasian Plant Disease Notes, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13314-018-0291-8
Authors

A. Reyes-Tena, R. Vallejo-González, R. Santillán-Mendoza, G. Rodríguez-Alvarado, J. Larsen, S. P. Fernández-Pavía

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 55%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,299,930
of 23,026,672 outputs
Outputs from Australasian Plant Disease Notes
#17
of 141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,458
of 331,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australasian Plant Disease Notes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,026,672 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them