↓ Skip to main content

Surface exposure of phosphatidylserine in pathological cells

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, May 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
8 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
642 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
313 Mendeley
Title
Surface exposure of phosphatidylserine in pathological cells
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, May 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00018-005-4527-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. F. A. Zwaal, P. Comfurius, E. M. Bevers

Abstract

The asymmetric phospholipid distribution in plasma membranes is normally maintained by energy-dependent lipid transporters that translocate different phospholipids from one monolayer to the other against their respective concentration gradients. When cells are activated, or enter apoptosis, lipid asymmetry can be perturbed by other lipid transporters (scramblases) that shuttle phospholipids non-specifically between the two monolayers. This exposes phosphatidylserine (PS) at the cells' outer surface. Since PS promotes blood coagulation, defective scramblase activity upon platelet stimulation causes a bleeding disorder (Scott syndrome). PS exposure also plays a pivotal role in the recognition and removal of apoptotic cells via a PS-recognizing receptor on phagocytic cells. Furthermore, expression of PS at the cell surface can occur in a wide variety of disorders. This review aims at highlighting how PS expression in different cells may complicate a variety of pathological conditions, including those that promote thromboembolic complications or produce aberrations in apoptotic cell removal.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 302 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 20%
Researcher 46 15%
Student > Master 39 12%
Student > Bachelor 38 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 8%
Other 44 14%
Unknown 59 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 61 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 13%
Chemistry 21 7%
Engineering 11 4%
Other 46 15%
Unknown 59 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,460,684
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#571
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,446
of 59,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.