↓ Skip to main content

Ecological evaluation of local extinction: the case of two genera of endemic Mexican fish, Zoogoneticus and Skiffia

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Ecological evaluation of local extinction: the case of two genera of endemic Mexican fish, Zoogoneticus and Skiffia
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, October 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1024155731112
Authors

Marina Yolanda De La Vega-Salazar, Edgar Avila-Luna, Constantino Macías-Garcia

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 4%
Mexico 2 2%
France 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 75 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 23%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Professor 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 59%
Environmental Science 13 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Unspecified 1 1%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,179
of 2,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,778
of 56,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.