↓ Skip to main content

MPGN II – genetically determined by defective complement regulation?

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Nephrology, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
MPGN II – genetically determined by defective complement regulation?
Published in
Pediatric Nephrology, September 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00467-006-0299-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph Licht, Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt, Michael Kirschfink, Peter F. Zipfel, Bernd Hoppe

Abstract

MPGN II is a rare disease which is characterized by complement containing deposits within the GBM. The disease is characterized by functional impairment of the GBM causing progressive loss of renal function eventually resulting in end stage renal disease. It now becomes evident that in addition to C3NeF, which inhibits the inactivation of the alternative C3 convertase C3bBb, different genetically determined factors are also involved in the pathogenesis of MPGN II. These factors though different from C3NeF also result in defective complement regulation acting either through separate pathways or synergistically with C3NeF. Following the finding of MPGN II in Factor H deficient animals, patients with MPGN II were identified presenting with an activated complement system caused by Factor H deficiency. Factor H gene mutations result in a lack of plasma Factor H or in a functional defect of Factor H protein. Loss of Factor H function can also be caused by inactivating Factor H autoantibodies, C3 mutations preventing interaction between C3 and Factor H, or autoantibodies against C3. Identification of patients with MPGN II caused by defective complement control may allow treatment by replacement of the missing factor via plasma infusion, thus possibly preventing or at least delaying disease progress.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 17%
Student > Master 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Psychology 1 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#1,857
of 4,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,309
of 87,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.