↓ Skip to main content

The dietary basis for temporal partitioning: food habits of coexisting Acomys species

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, October 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The dietary basis for temporal partitioning: food habits of coexisting Acomys species
Published in
Oecologia, October 1999
DOI 10.1007/s004420050913
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noga Kronfeld-Schor, Tamar Dayan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Brazil 3 2%
Colombia 2 2%
South Africa 2 2%
Israel 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 105 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 25%
Researcher 26 21%
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 15 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 58%
Environmental Science 17 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 22 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,774
of 4,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,570
of 35,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.