↓ Skip to main content

ILK (β1-integrin-linked protein kinase): a novel immunohistochemical marker for Ewing’s sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumour

Overview of attention for article published in Virchows Archiv, August 1998
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
ILK (β1-integrin-linked protein kinase): a novel immunohistochemical marker for Ewing’s sarcoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumour
Published in
Virchows Archiv, August 1998
DOI 10.1007/s004280050225
Pubmed ID
Authors

Doo Hyun Chung, Jong Im Lee, Myeong Cherl Kook, Jeong Ran Kim, Soon Ha Kim, Eun Young Choi, Seong Hoe Park, H. G. Song

Abstract

ILK (beta1-integrin-linked protein kinase) is a recently identified 59-kDa serine/threonine protein kinase that interacts with the cytoplasmic domain of the beta1-integrin containing four ankyrin-like repeats. We have developed a polyclonal antibody against ILK and explored the ILK immunoreactivity in normal human cells and tissues. ILK was mainly expressed in cardiac muscle and skeletal muscles. Surprisingly, ILK expression was observed in Ewing's sarcoma (ES; 100%), primitive neuroectodermal tumour (PNET; 100%), medulloblastoma (100%), and neuroblastoma (33.3%), whereas other small round cell sarcomas were not stained by the anti-ILK antibody. These results suggest that ILK could be a novel marker for tumours with primitive neural differentiation. Our findings support the notion that ES is a tumour that is closely related to PNET and that both originate from the neuroectoderm. ILK may be a sensitive and specific immunohistochemical marker and useful for the positive identification of ES and PNET in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 21%
Student > Postgraduate 2 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 14%
Student > Master 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 3 21%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 14%
Unknown 3 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2021.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Virchows Archiv
#223
of 2,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,607
of 31,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virchows Archiv
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.