↓ Skip to main content

The role of integrin-linked kinase (ILK) in cancer progression

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
The role of integrin-linked kinase (ILK) in cancer progression
Published in
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, December 2003
DOI 10.1023/a:1023777013659
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sujata Persad, Shoukat Dedhar

Abstract

Integrin-linked kinase (ILK) is an intracellular protein, which interacts with the cytoplasmic domains of integrin beta and beta3 subunits. ILK is a 59 kDa protein containing a phosphoinositide phospholipid-binding domain flanked by an N-terminal ankyrin repeat domain and a C-terminal serine/threonine protein kinase domain. Genetic and biochemical evidence have established an essential role of ILK in connecting integrins to the actin cytoskeleton. Apart from integrins, ILK interacts with several adaptor and signaling proteins resulting in its activation and localization to focal adhesion plaques. The kinase activity of ILK is stimulated upon integrin engagement, as well as by growth factors and chemokines in a PI-3Kinase-dependent manner. ILK can mediate the phosphorylation of a variety of intracellular substrates, most notable of which are: protein kinase B (PKB/Akt), glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) and myosin light chain. Gain and loss of function strategies have shown that overexpression, and/or constitutive activation of ILK results in oncogenic transformation and progression to invasive and metastatic phenotypes. In addition ILK expression and activity are upregulated in several types of cancers. In this review, we summarize the adaptor and signaling properties ofILK, and also progress in the identification of therapeutic strategies for inhibition of ILK activity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Malaysia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 75 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 26%
Researcher 17 21%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Chemistry 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 17 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#328
of 873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,085
of 142,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.