| Title |
Limits of Coherent Addition of Lasers: Simple Estimate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Optical Review, November 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10043-005-0445-8 |
| Authors |
Dmitrii Kouznetsov, Jean-François Bisson, Akira Shirakawa, Ken-ichi Ueda |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 100% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 117% |
| Engineering | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2015.
All research outputs
#4,696,232
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Optical Review
#16
of 235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,912
of 60,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Optical Review
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 235 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.