| Title |
Marine biogeographic disjunction in central New Zealand
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Marine Biology, May 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00227-005-1632-7 |
| Authors |
K. L. Ayers, J. M. Waters |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 74 | 76% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2008.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Marine Biology
#1,239
of 3,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,334
of 57,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Marine Biology
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.