↓ Skip to main content

Utility of Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover in the Follow-up of Patients Treated with Bisphosphonates

Overview of attention for article published in Calcified Tissue International, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Utility of Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover in the Follow-up of Patients Treated with Bisphosphonates
Published in
Calcified Tissue International, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s002239900541
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. N. Rosen, A. C. Moses, J. Garber, D. S. Ross, S. L. Lee, S. L. Greenspan

Abstract

Biochemical markers of bone turnover are often measured in patients treated with antiresorptive agents to monitor the effects of therapy. In order for a change in these markers to clearly indicate treatment effect, the change in the markers must exceed the amount of spontaneous variation typically seen with no treatment. Based on the measured long-term variability of markers in untreated patients, we defined a minimum significant change (MSC), that is, a change that was sufficiently large that it was unlikely to be due to spontaneous variability. We also examined the changes in markers of bone turnover in subjects treated with pamidronate to see how often observed changes in turnover after treatment exceeded the MSC. We found that urinary markers of bone resorption are best measured on 2-hour fasting samples, because results on random urine showed poor precision and less decline with therapy. We also found that of all the markers, urinary N-telopeptide cross-links (NTX) had the greatest decline after therapy (58%), although it also had the highest long-term variability (29.5%). The marker that most often showed a decline with treatment that exceeded the MSC was serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase where 74% of observed changes exceeded the MSC. Other markers that often showed a decline with treatment that exceeded the MSC were 2-hour fasting urine NTX and free deoxypyridinoline, where 57% and 48%, respectively, of changes in therapy exceeded the MSC. The ideal marker would combine the large decline after treatment characteristic of NTX (60-70%) with the good precision of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Unspecified 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 21%
Mathematics 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Calcified Tissue International
#542
of 1,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,402
of 306,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Calcified Tissue International
#21
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.