↓ Skip to main content

Geology and petrology of Mahukona Volcano, Hawaii

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Volcanology, April 1991
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geology and petrology of Mahukona Volcano, Hawaii
Published in
Bulletin of Volcanology, April 1991
DOI 10.1007/bf00301227
Authors

David A Clague, James G Moore

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 60%
Environmental Science 3 15%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,490,851
of 22,896,955 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#384
of 1,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,127
of 18,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,896,955 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them