| Title |
Possible role of procathepsin D in human cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Folia Microbiologica, January 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02931296 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Vashishta, M. Fusek, V. Větvička |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 20% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,696,232
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Folia Microbiologica
#44
of 739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,871
of 139,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Microbiologica
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 739 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.