| Title |
Differential fractionation of oxygen isotopes by cyanide-resistant and cyanide-sensitive respiration in plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Planta, April 1989
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00392616 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert D. Guy, Joseph A. Berry, Marilyn L. Fogel, Thomas C. Hoering |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Professor | 6 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 34% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 19% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,453,827
of 22,787,797 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#599
of 2,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,006
of 14,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,787,797 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,718 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them