↓ Skip to main content

Isolation and characterization of rad51 orthologs from Coprinus cinereus and Lycopersicon esculentum, and phylogenetic analysis of eukaryotic recA homologs

Overview of attention for article published in Current Genetics, February 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Isolation and characterization of rad51 orthologs from Coprinus cinereus and Lycopersicon esculentum, and phylogenetic analysis of eukaryotic recA homologs
Published in
Current Genetics, February 1997
DOI 10.1007/s002940050189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalie Yeager Stassen, J. M. Logsdon Jr., G. J. Vora, Hildo H. Offenberg, Jeffrey D. Palmer, M. E. Zolan

Abstract

In eubacteria, the recA gene has long been recognized as essential for homologous recombination and DNA repair. Recent work has identified recA homologs in archaebacteria and eukaryotes, thus emphasizing the universal role this gene plays in DNA metabolism. We have isolated and characterized two new recA homologs, one from the basidiomycete Coprinus cinereus and the other from the angiosperm Lycopersicon esculentum. Like the RAD51 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the Coprinus gene is highly induced by gamma irradiation and during meiosis. Phylogenetic analyses of eukarotic recA homologs reveal a gene duplication early in eukaryotic evolution which gave rise to two putatively monophyletic groups of recA-like genes. One group of 11 characterized genes, designated the rad51 group, is orthologous to the Saccharomyces RAD51 gene and also contains the Coprinus and Lycopersicon genes. The other group of seven genes, designated the dmc1 group, is orthologous to the Saccharomyces DMC1 gene. Sequence comparisons and phylogenetic analysis reveal extensive lineage- and gene-specific differences in rates of RecA protein evolution. Dmc1 consistently evolves faster than Rad51, and fungal proteins of both types, especially those of Saccharomyces, change rapidly, particularly in comparison to the slowly evolving vertebrate proteins. The Drosophila Rad51 protein has undergone remarkably rapid sequence divergence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Germany 2 4%
Unknown 44 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 27%
Professor 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 27%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#5,445,969
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Current Genetics
#123
of 1,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,634
of 93,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Genetics
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,232 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.